Florida Product Liability Lawyer
Designers, manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers are supposed to provide consumers with safe and effective products. Unfortunately, defective and dangerous products that cause thousands of injuries and deaths each year make it into consumers’ hands anyway — and in some instances, the defects and risks were known to the companies that sold them. Product liability covers three classic failures: poor or unsafe design; unsafe or inferior manufacturing; and a lack of proper instructions or product warning labels.
As consumers, we come into contact with numerous products each day, including airbags, baby strollers, gym equipment, food, and prescription medicine. When a dangerous product makes its way into the marketplace, the responsible parties should be held liable for its safety. A Florida product liability lawyer at Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa (RDCY) can assist in compiling the evidence for a potential claim and walk those injured through the legal steps necessary to seek recovery — including the mass tort and group proceedings in which many drug and device claims are resolved.
Have Questions About a Defective Product Injury in Florida?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.
Types of Product Liability Cases
The Florida product liability attorneys at RDCY represent people who have suffered serious and catastrophic injuries in accidents where defective products were involved, and family members who lost a loved one to a wrongful death caused by an auto product defect or another failed product. The firm’s product work spans decades and a wide range of defective products, including:
- Defective drugs
- Asbestos and mesothelioma exposure
- Defective automobiles and components
- Defective cribs and other children’s products
- Defective medical devices
- Defective construction and industrial equipment
- Defective toys
- Batteries, appliances, and consumer products that ignite or explode
Some of these claims proceed as individual lawsuits; others — particularly drug and medical device claims, where the same defect injures people across the country — are litigated in coordinated state or federal group proceedings in which RDCY’s attorneys have long experience. Which track a case belongs on is an early strategic decision, made after the product, its regulatory history, and the injury are understood.
The Three Ways a Product Can Be Defective
A design defect exists when the product was dangerous as designed — every unit carries the same risk because the blueprint itself is flawed, and a reasonable alternative design would have prevented the harm. A manufacturing defect exists when a particular unit departed from its own design: the contaminated batch, the misassembled restraint, the weld that did not hold. A warning defect exists when the product’s instructions and warnings failed to disclose a risk, or understated it, in a way that would have changed how the product was used or prescribed.
The distinction is not academic. Each theory demands different proof — engineering analysis and alternative designs for the first, production records and exemplar comparisons for the second, label history and risk knowledge for the third — and defendants defend each differently. Serious product cases usually plead all theories the evidence supports and let discovery establish which the company’s own documents confirm.
How Could a Defective Product Affect Your Legal Options?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.
Who Can Be Held Liable for a Defective Product
Responsibility can sit anywhere in the chain of distribution: the manufacturer whose name is on the product, the supplier of a defective component, the distributor and wholesaler that moved it, and the retailer that sold it. Florida’s strict liability doctrine focuses on the condition of the product rather than each seller’s personal carelessness, which prevents the chain from defeating a claim by pointing in a circle.
Alongside strict liability, most cases plead negligence — in design choices, testing, quality control, or the decision to keep selling after incidents accumulated — and breach of warranty. Claims against prescribing or implanting professionals occasionally overlap with product claims where a drug or device is involved; the crossroads of medical malpractice and product liability is a recurring feature of device litigation, and sorting the product defendants from the provider defendants early protects both claims’ deadlines.
Proving a Product Liability Claim
Product cases are won on preservation and expertise. The product itself — kept unaltered, with its packaging, instructions, and purchase records — is the central exhibit, examined by engineers and specialists who can identify the failure mode and test it against the manufacturer’s design and the regulatory record: recall history, adverse-event reports, prior lawsuits, and the warnings the company gave in other countries or later years.
That is why these cases cannot be built cheaply or casually, and why the choice of firm matters. RDCY’s product liability lawyers obtain expert witnesses and use experienced and respected medical authorities, accident reconstruction specialists, and investigators from across the country, then strategize and build the case that brings the responsible parties to light. The investigation begins with a simple instruction to every client: keep the product, keep everything that came with it, and let no one take it for ‘inspection’ without legal protection in place.
What Compensation a Product Claim Can Cover
The damages framework is the same as in other catastrophic injury cases, applied to harms that are often severe: the full cost of past and future medical care, rehabilitation, and assistance; lost income and diminished earning capacity; and compensation for pain, suffering, disfigurement, and the loss of a normal life. Where a defective product kills, the Florida Wrongful Death Act governs the family’s recovery.
Two features distinguish product damages in practice. First, the defendant’s resources: manufacturers and their insurers defend these cases as precedents, not just claims, and they price early offers accordingly. Second, the group dimension: where hundreds or thousands of people share a defect, coordinated proceedings create testing and settlement structures that an individual claimant can join — but an individual’s recovery still turns on their own injury, records, and proof, which must be developed with the same care as a standalone case.
When a Product Case Becomes a Group or Mass Tort Proceeding
Some defects injure so many people the same way — a drug’s undisclosed side effect, a device that fractures or migrates, a chemical exposure — that courts coordinate the claims. Cases may be gathered before a single judge for discovery and bellwether trials, or resolved through inventory settlements in which each claimant’s recovery is calculated from their own documented injuries, exposure, and treatment. RDCY’s attorneys have spent decades in exactly this kind of pharmaceutical and product litigation, which is a distinct discipline from single-plaintiff practice.
Coordination does not make an individual claim automatic or interchangeable. Eligibility cutoffs, registration deadlines, proof-of-use and proof-of-injury requirements, and medical-record substantiation all apply claimant by claimant, and people who wait can find a program closed or a deadline passed. The right first step is the same in both worlds: identify the product precisely, preserve it and all of its records, and have the claim evaluated promptly while every track is still open.
Deadlines in Florida Product Cases
Two clocks govern. The first is the limitations period under § 95.11, which depends on the theory pleaded — negligence-based claims are now generally subject to a two-year period — measured from the injury or, in latent-injury cases such as drug side effects, from when the injury and its likely cause were or should have been discovered. The second is Florida’s twelve-year statute of repose for products under § 95.031, which can extinguish a claim based on the product’s age before any injury occurs, subject to statutory exceptions.
Drug and device claims add a further timing layer when coordinated proceedings set their own registration and filing deadlines. Because the interplay of these clocks is unforgiving — and because the product’s delivery date, not just the injury date, can decide the case — a product injury should be evaluated as soon as the suspicion exists, not after treatment concludes.
The Importance of an Experienced Florida Product Liability Lawyer
Defective product cases are complex and often involve more than one liable party, from the manufacturer to the wholesaler or retailer. That is why an injured person needs an experienced product liability law firm with the financial resources to take on these companies: expert-heavy litigation against a national manufacturer is not a fair fight for a firm that cannot advance the cost of building the proof.
If you have a case, RDCY’s Florida product liability attorneys will represent you to the utmost of our ability and commit to achieving a successful resolution. Consistent with the firm’s practice, clients are not charged fees unless and until there is compensation by settlement or verdict, and the firm advances the costs and expenses of the case. If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product, contact us: if wrongdoing or negligence contributed to the injury, we will defend your rights and stand up to the responsible party on your behalf.
Related Pages for Florida Product Liability Claims
- Defective drugs and medical devices
- Defective breast implants
- Catastrophic injury claims
- Burn injuries from failed products
- Florida personal injury overview
Professional Recognition
Recognition applies to the named attorneys and selection years. See the linked profiles for details.
Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Product Liability Claims
Answers to common questions from people injured by defective products and their families — defect types, strict liability, recalls, deadlines, and preserving the product. This is general information, not legal advice about a specific case.
What are the three ways a product can be defective under Florida law?
Product claims generally allege one or more of three defects. A design defect means the product was dangerous as designed, even when built exactly to specification. A manufacturing defect means the individual unit departed from its own design — a flaw introduced in production or assembly. A marketing or warning defect means the product reached consumers without instructions or warnings adequate to its risks, a category the FDA’s medical-device oversight illustrates in the device context.
Many real cases plead more than one: a device or vehicle component may be badly designed, inconsistently manufactured, and sold with warnings that understated a known failure mode. The defect theory shapes the expert evidence, which is why the product and its documentation are analyzed before a theory is chosen.
Sources: FDA: Medical Devices; Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine.
Who can be sued in a Florida defective product case?
Claims can reach the parties in the chain of distribution: the manufacturer, and depending on the facts, component suppliers, distributors, wholesalers, and retailers that placed the product into consumers’ hands. Florida follows strict liability for defective products in that chain, which means an injured person does not have to prove that each seller personally acted carelessly — the focus is on the product’s condition when it left that party’s control.
Identifying the full chain matters practically: manufacturers and distributors carry different insurance, hold different records, and point at each other. The FDA’s recall listings, which name the firms responsible for a recalled product, show how many hands a single product passes through before it reaches a consumer.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine; FDA: Recalls, Market Withdrawals, and Safety Alerts.
Do I have to prove the company knew the product was dangerous?
For a strict liability claim, no: the question is whether the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left the defendant’s control, not what the company knew. Knowledge still matters in the case — internal testing, prior incident reports, and what a company learned after launch are central to warning-defect claims and to whether a jury hears that a risk was concealed — and the FDA’s drug recall records regularly document hazards identified only after products were widely sold.
Negligence claims pleaded alongside strict liability do examine the company’s conduct directly. A thorough case develops both: the product’s condition through engineering evidence, and the company’s behavior through its documents and regulatory history.
Sources: FDA: Drug Recalls; Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine.
How long do I have to file a Florida product liability claim?
Florida’s limitations law, section 95.11, sets the filing period, and the period depends on the theory pleaded — negligence-based claims generally must be filed within two years under the current statute, and claims should never be timed off an older page’s longer figure without advice. Separately, section 95.031 imposes a statute of repose for products: in most cases a product liability action must begin within twelve years after the product was delivered to its first purchaser, whatever the filing period would otherwise allow.
The repose rule makes old products urgent cases: a claim can be extinguished by the product’s age before an injury is even discovered. Establishing the product’s identity, model, and delivery date early is therefore one of the first tasks in any product investigation.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 95.031, Online Sunshine; Florida Statutes § 95.11, Online Sunshine.
Does a recall of the product mean I automatically win my case?
No — but a recall is powerful material. The FDA’s recalls, market withdrawals, and safety alerts document that a regulator or the manufacturer itself identified a hazard in the product. A recall can corroborate the defect, establish notice, and defeat the defense that the failure mode was unknown or impossible.
The injured person must still prove that the defect existed in their product and caused their injury, and defendants argue that a voluntary recall shows responsibility rather than liability, or that the plaintiff’s unit was unaffected. Conversely, the absence of a recall proves nothing either way — many dangerous products are never recalled, or are recalled only after litigation exposes the pattern.
Sources: FDA: Recalls, Market Withdrawals, and Safety Alerts; Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine.
What if the company says I misused the product or was partly at fault?
Comparative fault applies in product cases too. Under section 768.81, an injured person’s recovery is reduced by their share of fault, and misuse of a product — using it in a way the manufacturer could not reasonably foresee — can be a defense. But foreseeable misuse is part of design: manufacturers must anticipate how real people actually use their products, including predictable mistakes.
The analysis is concrete: what the warnings actually said and where they appeared, how the product was marketed, how other consumers used it, and whether the injury would have happened in ordinary use. The FDA’s device and drug safety materials show how often harm occurs during normal, intended use — which is why ‘misuse’ is a claim to be tested against evidence, not accepted from a press release.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine; FDA: Medical Devices.
What compensation can a defective product claim include?
A product claim covers the losses the injury caused: emergency and hospital care, surgeries and rehabilitation, future treatment where the injury is lasting, lost income and diminished earning capacity, and the non-economic losses — pain and suffering, mental anguish, scarring and disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life. Where a defective product causes a catastrophic injury, future care is projected and valued with medical and economic experts.
RDCY’s product practice includes mass tort and group litigation, where many people harmed by the same drug or device proceed in coordinated fashion; individual claims, however, are valued on the individual’s own injuries and records. Punitive damages are possible only where Florida’s statutory standard for them is met.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 768.81, Online Sunshine; FDA: Drug Recalls.
Our family lost a loved one to a defective product. Who brings the claim?
Under the Florida Wrongful Death Act, beginning at section 768.16, the claim is brought by the personal representative of the deceased person’s estate, for the benefit of the estate and the statutory survivors — typically a spouse and children, and in some circumstances parents or other dependent relatives. The survivors’ recoveries include lost support and services, lost companionship, and mental pain and suffering, along with medical and funeral expenses.
The product evidence in a death case is even more perishable than in an injury case: the vehicle is salvaged, the device is discarded, the medication is thrown out in grief and housekeeping. Preserving the product and its packaging, instructions, and purchase records is the single most valuable step a family can take in the first days.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 768.16, Florida Wrongful Death Act; Florida Statutes § 95.11, Online Sunshine.
What should I do with the product that injured me?
Keep it, exactly as it is. Do not repair it, alter it, return it for a refund, or surrender it to the manufacturer or an insurer who asks to ‘inspect’ it without conditions — the product is the central evidence in the case, and a defect that cannot be examined usually cannot be proven. Photograph it from every angle, keep the packaging, instructions, warnings, receipts, and any remaining units or refills, and note where and when it was bought.
The FDA’s recall database is worth checking to see whether the same hazard has been reported, but do not wait for a recall to act. If the product was destroyed before you understood its significance — in a fire, or by a hospital or tow yard — tell your lawyer immediately; records, photographs, and exemplar products can sometimes fill the gap, but only if the work starts early.
Sources: FDA: Recalls, Market Withdrawals, and Safety Alerts; Florida Statutes § 95.031, Online Sunshine.
How much does it cost to have RDCY evaluate a product case?
The evaluation is free, and there is no obligation to proceed. We look at the product, the injury, the regulatory and recall history, and the deadlines — including the statute-of-repose question — then explain whether a claim appears viable and how it would be investigated, including whether it belongs in individual litigation or a coordinated group proceeding.
If you decide to move forward, the fee arrangement is explained and put in writing before work begins; as the live practice standard states, the firm advances the costs of building the case, including the expert work product cases require. If the facts or the law do not support a claim, we tell you that honestly, at no charge, with the reasoning.
Sources: Florida Statutes § 95.11, Online Sunshine; Florida Statutes § 768.28, Online Sunshine.
Related Articles
- Crossroads of Medical Malpractice and Product Liability in Florida
- Legal Recourse for Victims of Medical Device Failures in Florida
- Dangerous Truth About “Feel Free”: Why Accountability Can’t Wait
- Personal Injury Lawsuits Over Undisclosed Drug Side Effects
- Can Dupixent Cause Cancer? What the Evidence Actually Shows
Need Help With a Case Involving a Defective Product?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.
