Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis FL Lawyer | Florida
A genetic test is one part of a medical evaluation. The legal issue may involve selecting the wrong test, mishandling a sample, misinterpreting a result, or failing to explain the test’s limits. Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa reviews Florida genetic-testing misdiagnosis claims by examining what the test could establish and how the result affected the patient’s care.
A genetic result does not always answer the clinical question
MedlinePlus explains that positive, negative, and uncertain genetic results can have different meanings. A negative result may not exclude every genetic explanation, and a variant of uncertain significance does not by itself establish that a person has a particular disease.
The test method, genes examined, laboratory classification, family history, and clinical findings matter. A genetic test may assess risk rather than diagnose current illness. The investigation should evaluate what the provider reasonably understood at the time, not judge an earlier decision solely through later knowledge.
Have Questions About Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.

Identify the decision that changed the patient’s care
A claim needs more than dissatisfaction with a result. Ask whether the interpretation led to unnecessary treatment, delayed evaluation, a missed referral, or another identifiable injury. Consent and counseling may be relevant when the test’s purpose and limitations were not adequately explained.
Screening and diagnostic tests should not be treated as interchangeable. Direct-to-consumer testing also raises different questions from a clinical laboratory test ordered to investigate symptoms. Keep the report and instructions from the actual test performed.
Collect the complete testing record
Useful materials include the test order, consent information, specimen and accession details, original report, amended reports, counseling notes, family-history information, and subsequent diagnostic records. Preserve emails or portal messages explaining the result.
Qualified review may involve medical genetics, the relevant treating specialty, and laboratory expertise. The attorney should investigate whether the problem arose in collection, analysis, interpretation, communication, or follow-up rather than assuming that every participant made the same error.
Proving a Florida medical-negligence claim
Florida’s medical-negligence standard requires evidence that a provider’s departure from appropriate care caused injury. Genetic uncertainty makes a careful causation analysis especially important. What would appropriate interpretation or follow-up have changed for this particular patient?
Presuit investigation and notice obligations under Chapter 766 can apply, and §95.11 governs relevant filing periods and exceptions. The patient should obtain a review promptly without waiting for every scientific question to be resolved. Keep any ongoing medical care separate from the decision to investigate a legal claim.
Why patients turn to Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa
Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa handles medical-malpractice claims. Shareholder Sean C. Domnick is a Florida Bar board-certified civil trial lawyer whose practice includes medical malpractice and nursing-home litigation.
When a genetic test is connected to a missed diagnosis, patients often need answers about the test ordered, the result reported and the follow-up care provided. The firm can discuss the treatment decisions that concern you and review whether a medical-malpractice investigation is appropriate.
Sources: RDCY: Sean C. Domnick biography.
Related medical-malpractice pages
- Medical Malpractice Overview
- Failure to Provide Medication
- Radiology Errors
- Medication Error
- Failure to Perform a Critical Procedure
- Failure to Diagnose
- Hospital Negligence
- Nursing Error
- Errors of Commission
- Anesthesia Error
- Errors of Omission
- Emergency Room Error
- Delayed Diagnosis
- Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis
- Distracted Doctoring
- Surgical Errors
- Inadequate Testing
How Could Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis Affect Your Legal Options?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.

Professional Recognition
Recognition applies to the named attorneys and selection years. See the linked profiles for details.
NOTABLE RESULTS
Published RDCY outcomes, with broader practice results identified separately:
$31,000,000 catastrophic-injury result · $2,500,000 medical-malpractice settlement
Read more about these results
RDCY’s published results list a $31,000,000 catastrophic-injury outcome in Ft. Lauderdale. This is a broader catastrophic-injury result, not an outcome for this exact case type. Source: RDCY’s published results.
The firm’s January 25, 2023 Nicole Kruegel announcement reports a $2,500,000 medical-malpractice settlement. It is shown as a broader medical-malpractice result. Firm source.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.
GOOGLE REVIEWS
General feedback from individual five-star Google reviews:
“Great firm to work with would highly recommend to anyone.”
— Ryan
“I would highly recommend the firm to anyone in need of their services.”
— knightowl1953
Florida Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis FL FAQs
These answers provide general information. The applicable rules depend on the facts and type of claim; a case review can address your circumstances.
Does a positive genetic test always mean I have a disease?
No. Its meaning depends on the test and condition; some results indicate risk rather than a current diagnosis.
MedlinePlus explains that a result must be interpreted with clinical and family information. A legal claim separately asks whether the provider’s interpretation or follow-up departed from appropriate care and caused harm.
Sources: MedlinePlus Genetics: Interpreting genetic test results; Florida Statutes §766.102: medical negligence standard.
Does a negative genetic test exclude every genetic condition?
No. A negative result can have limits based on the test and what is known about the condition.
The scope and method of testing matter. Review the report and counseling rather than assuming that every negative result promised to rule out all inherited disease.
Sources: MedlinePlus Genetics: Interpreting genetic test results; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
Is a variant of uncertain significance a definite diagnosis?
No. An uncertain result does not establish whether the identified change is responsible for disease.
Clinical interpretation and appropriate follow-up are essential. A malpractice investigation examines what was reasonably known and advised at the time, not simply whether classification changed later.
Sources: MedlinePlus Genetics: Interpreting genetic test results; Florida Statutes §766.102: medical negligence standard.
Can incorrect genetic-test counseling support a claim?
It may if counseling fell below the applicable standard and caused injury.
The report, consent, clinical circumstances, and advice should be reviewed together. Scientific uncertainty alone does not establish negligence, and a claim needs an identifiable consequence of the deficient care.
Sources: MedlinePlus Genetics: Interpreting genetic test results; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
What evidence helps locate an error in genetic testing?
The order, specimen details, original and amended reports, consent, counseling notes, and later care records can help identify the problem.
Collection, laboratory analysis, interpretation, and follow-up involve different duties. Preserve the actual test documentation and obtain a qualified review before attributing the error to a particular provider.
Sources: HHS: Your medical records; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
What must be proved in a Florida medical-malpractice claim?
A claim needs proof of a departure from the applicable professional standard of care that caused injury.
A changed diagnosis or disappointing result is not enough. Qualified review must explain what appropriate care required and how the failure affected the patient’s outcome.
Sources: Florida Statutes §766.102: medical negligence standard; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
Is expert review needed before a Florida malpractice lawsuit?
Generally, Florida’s presuit process requires investigation and corroboration by an appropriately qualified medical expert.
The expert requirements depend on the provider and allegations. A patient’s suspicion does not replace the statutory investigation, and obtaining records and a suitable review can take time.
Sources: Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation; Florida Statutes §766.102: medical negligence standard.
Can a Florida medical-malpractice lawsuit be filed immediately?
The governing presuit requirements must be addressed before filing a qualifying claim.
Chapter 766 includes notice and investigation procedures. Identify prospective defendants and deadlines early; a complaint to a provider is not the same as completing the statutory presuit process.
Sources: Florida Statutes §766.106: presuit notice; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
How long do Florida medical-malpractice claims have to be filed?
Section 95.11 generally provides a two-year incident-or-discovery period with a four-year repose limit, subject to statutory exceptions.
Discovery, childhood claims, concealment, presuit rules, and other facts can affect the calculation. Obtain an individual deadline review rather than assuming the period starts with the final diagnosis.
Sources: Florida Statutes §95.11: limitations; Florida Statutes §766.106: presuit notice.
Can patients request the medical records needed for a review?
Patients generally have rights to access their protected medical records under HIPAA, subject to its rules and exceptions.
Ask for the records relevant to the care and keep original communications. Medical-malpractice investigation may also require additional evidence and expert review beyond the material in a patient portal.
Sources: HHS: Your medical records; Florida Statutes §766.203: presuit expert investigation.
Need Help With a Case Involving Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis?
Call us or request a case review by our experts.

















