Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis FL Lawyer | Florida

A genetic test is one part of a medical evaluation. The legal issue may involve selecting the wrong test, mishandling a sample, misinterpreting a result, or failing to explain the test’s limits. Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa reviews Florida genetic-testing misdiagnosis claims by examining what the test could establish and how the result affected the patient’s care.

A genetic result does not always answer the clinical question

MedlinePlus explains that positive, negative, and uncertain genetic results can have different meanings. A negative result may not exclude every genetic explanation, and a variant of uncertain significance does not by itself establish that a person has a particular disease.

The test method, genes examined, laboratory classification, family history, and clinical findings matter. A genetic test may assess risk rather than diagnose current illness. The investigation should evaluate what the provider reasonably understood at the time, not judge an earlier decision solely through later knowledge.

Have Questions About Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis?

Call us or request a case review by our experts.

RDCY law firm shareholders

Identify the decision that changed the patient’s care

A claim needs more than dissatisfaction with a result. Ask whether the interpretation led to unnecessary treatment, delayed evaluation, a missed referral, or another identifiable injury. Consent and counseling may be relevant when the test’s purpose and limitations were not adequately explained.

Screening and diagnostic tests should not be treated as interchangeable. Direct-to-consumer testing also raises different questions from a clinical laboratory test ordered to investigate symptoms. Keep the report and instructions from the actual test performed.

Collect the complete testing record

Useful materials include the test order, consent information, specimen and accession details, original report, amended reports, counseling notes, family-history information, and subsequent diagnostic records. Preserve emails or portal messages explaining the result.

Qualified review may involve medical genetics, the relevant treating specialty, and laboratory expertise. The attorney should investigate whether the problem arose in collection, analysis, interpretation, communication, or follow-up rather than assuming that every participant made the same error.

Proving a Florida medical-negligence claim

Florida’s medical-negligence standard requires evidence that a provider’s departure from appropriate care caused injury. Genetic uncertainty makes a careful causation analysis especially important. What would appropriate interpretation or follow-up have changed for this particular patient?

Presuit investigation and notice obligations under Chapter 766 can apply, and §95.11 governs relevant filing periods and exceptions. The patient should obtain a review promptly without waiting for every scientific question to be resolved. Keep any ongoing medical care separate from the decision to investigate a legal claim.

Why patients turn to Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa

Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa handles medical-malpractice claims. Shareholder Sean C. Domnick is a Florida Bar board-certified civil trial lawyer whose practice includes medical malpractice and nursing-home litigation.

When a genetic test is connected to a missed diagnosis, patients often need answers about the test ordered, the result reported and the follow-up care provided. The firm can discuss the treatment decisions that concern you and review whether a medical-malpractice investigation is appropriate.

Sources: RDCY: Sean C. Domnick biography.

Related medical-malpractice pages

How Could Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis Affect Your Legal Options?

Call us or request a case review by our experts.

RDCY law firm shareholders

Professional Recognition

Lawdragon professional profileFlorida Super Lawyers Top 100 — 2026Miami Super Lawyers Top 100 — 2026

Recognition applies to the named attorneys and selection years. See the linked profiles for details.

Published Articles by RDCY Attorneys

Related healthcare commentary and broader reading on representation, damages and access to justice:

Articles retain their original language. Some publishers may require a subscription.

RDCY Videos and Social Posts

NOTABLE RESULTS

Published RDCY outcomes, with broader practice results identified separately:

$31,000,000 catastrophic-injury result · $2,500,000 medical-malpractice settlement

Read more about these results

RDCY’s published results list a $31,000,000 catastrophic-injury outcome in Ft. Lauderdale. This is a broader catastrophic-injury result, not an outcome for this exact case type. Source: RDCY’s published results.

The firm’s January 25, 2023 Nicole Kruegel announcement reports a $2,500,000 medical-malpractice settlement. It is shown as a broader medical-malpractice result. Firm source.

Read the firm’s case results

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.

GOOGLE REVIEWS

General feedback from individual five-star Google reviews:

“Great firm to work with would highly recommend to anyone.”

— Ryan

“I would highly recommend the firm to anyone in need of their services.”

— knightowl1953

Need Help With a Case Involving Genetic Testing Misdiagnosis?

Call us or request a case review by our experts.

RDCY law firm shareholders